Figure 3. Inside View of Termination Box
Figure 4 shows a close-up view of the measurement box as well as the
copper EMI tape sealing it and connecting it to the metal plane on the
table. One of the ferrite cores on the coaxial cable connecting the box
to the scope is also visible.
Figure 4. Measurement Box Mounting with Copper Shielding Tape
The test was conducted with a variety of short (one foot, 30 cm) and
long (> two feet, 60 cm) SATA cables. A close-up of the test setup for one of
the longer SATA cables is shown in Figure 5. Note the copper EMI tape
used to seal both boxes and connect the measurement box to the metal plane on the table.
Figure 5. Test Setup with Longer SATA Cable
Figure 6 shows the signal measured at the measurement box when the
simulator was discharged directly into the metal plane near the
measurement box. This was done to check for leakage of ESD noise into
the measurement box. I call this a "null experiment." The peak noise
recorded was about one Volt.
Figure 6. Measured Voltage in Null Experiment (Discharge to Metal Plane near Measurement Box
(Vertical scale = 5 V/div, Horizontal scale = 10 ns/div)
Figures 7 and 8 show results for two SATA cables although the
cable in Figure 8 was somewhat longer. The important point to note is
the peak voltage between the signal wires and the shield was over 10
Volts in both cases! This is not good for only 500 Volt ESD and is
likely due to the plastic connectors used requiring the shield to be
connected through the pins of the connector at each end of the cable.
Figure 7. Measured Voltage For a Short (~9 inch) SATA Cable
(Vertical scale = 5 V/div, Horizontal scale = 10 ns/div)
Figure 8. Measured Voltage For Another SATA Cable
(Vertical scale = 5 V/div, Horizontal scale = 10 ns/div)
Figure 9 shows the results for a much longer cable. If the shielding
was limited by the cable, one might expect a higher amplitude, but a
lower amplitude resulted. The longer cable lowers the current that was
flowing because of increased inductance and this lowers the drop across
the shield connections in the connectors (shield transfer impedance of the connector pairs).
Still, six Volts peak ESD noise from a 500 Volt discharge is not good
for a cable.
Figure 9. Measured Voltage For a Long (>24 inches, 60 cm) SATA Cable
(Vertical scale = 5 V/div, Horizontal scale = 10 ns/div)
The ESD induced noise in this experiment can easily corrupt data being
transmitted on the SATA cables especially when one considers the fact
than only 500 Volt contact discharges were used, about 1/8 of the
amplitude used in general CE Mark testing. Either data errors or delays in
transmission may result. Also consider that the scope had a 500 MHz
bandwidth. If a higher bandwidth scope was used, the peak amplitudes
might be somewhat larger considering the ESD stress had a risetime of
around 300 to 500 ps.
In my opinion, cables and
connectors like these should not be used outside of shielded enclosures
if ESD induced errors ares not allowed.
Summary:
ESD stress was applied to typical SATA cables of a few different
manufacturers. In all cases, the amount of ESD noise present on the
signal wires was high enough to cause signal corruption for only 500
Volt ESD! In my opinion, cables and connectors like these should not be used
outside of shielded enclosures if ESD induced errors ares not allowed.