Figure 1. Test Setup for Measuring ESD Current From an ESD Simulator
Abstract: IEC 61000-4-2, the
equipment level ESD testing standard, recently has been applied to
individual solid state devices, a controversial use of the standard and
despite there being no instructions in the standard on applying it to
individual devices. In addition, some buyers are also insisting on an
older 150 pF/150 Ohm network instead of the current 150 pF/330 Ohm
network. Waveforms are presented comparing the current discharge of
the two networks as supplied with a modern ESD simulator.
Discussion: Figure 1 shows the
overall test setup for measuring the current waveform. The simulator
ground lead was connected to the metal plane on the top of the table,
the Horizontal Coupling Plane of the IEC 61000-4-2 test (as opposed to
performing the test on the floor reference ground plane). The test was
done near the edge of the table so the waveforms will not be exactly
the same as the calibration waveforms, but a valid comparison of the
two networks can be made. This same configuration was used to test a
number of solid state devices. Current was measured with a Fischer F-65
current probe and Agilent 54845a oscilloscope.
Figure 2 shows a close-up of the measurement. The discharge tip of the simulator easily fits through the F-65 current probe. I am holding the current probe slightly off the ground plane so as to minimize common mode ESD current from traveling down the coax shield to the scope. There were several ferrite cores on the coax at the scope to suppress common mode ESD currents as well. The coaxial cable used was RG-142B/U. Its shielding effectiveness is extremely good and RG142B/U coaxial cable is well suited for making ESD measurements with the F-65 one GHz current probe.
Figure 3 shows the discharge current for a 1 kV contact discharge using the 150 pF/330 Ohm network and Figure 4 shows the discharge current with the 150 pF/150 Ohm network. There are both significant differences and similarities in the two waveforms.
Figure 3. Waveform for 150 pF/330 Ohm network
Note that the that the initial current peak and its di/dt are about the same for both waveforms at about 3 Amperes, but the slow part of the waveform, current level lasting tens of nanoseconds, peaks at about 3 Amperes for the 150 Ohm network compared to about 2 Amperes for the 330 Ohm network. As expected, the 150 Ohm network delivers significantly more energy to a device compared to the 330 Ohm network.
The "hash" starting about 7 ns before before the current waveform is due to EMI from the ESD simulator and current discharge radiating directly into the scope. The hash starts 7 ns earlier because the air path to the scope has 7 ns less delay than the current waveform traveling down the coaxial cable to the scope. This can be reduced to insignificance by averaging several waveforms. An example of this approach will be covered in next month's Technical Tidbit for December 2010.
Summary:
Comparison of the current discharge from both 150 pF/150 Ohm and 150
pF/330 Ohm networks in an ESD simulator shows that the 150 Ohm network
delivers significantly more current and energy to the device under test but that
the initial fast current peak is about the same in amplitude and di/dt.
Figure 2 shows a close-up of the measurement. The discharge tip of the simulator easily fits through the F-65 current probe. I am holding the current probe slightly off the ground plane so as to minimize common mode ESD current from traveling down the coax shield to the scope. There were several ferrite cores on the coax at the scope to suppress common mode ESD currents as well. The coaxial cable used was RG-142B/U. Its shielding effectiveness is extremely good and RG142B/U coaxial cable is well suited for making ESD measurements with the F-65 one GHz current probe.
Figure 2. Close-up of Current Measurement
Figure 3 shows the discharge current for a 1 kV contact discharge using the 150 pF/330 Ohm network and Figure 4 shows the discharge current with the 150 pF/150 Ohm network. There are both significant differences and similarities in the two waveforms.
Figure 3. Waveform for 150 pF/330 Ohm network
Figure 4.Waveform for 150 pF/150 Ohm network
Note that the that the initial current peak and its di/dt are about the same for both waveforms at about 3 Amperes, but the slow part of the waveform, current level lasting tens of nanoseconds, peaks at about 3 Amperes for the 150 Ohm network compared to about 2 Amperes for the 330 Ohm network. As expected, the 150 Ohm network delivers significantly more energy to a device compared to the 330 Ohm network.
The "hash" starting about 7 ns before before the current waveform is due to EMI from the ESD simulator and current discharge radiating directly into the scope. The hash starts 7 ns earlier because the air path to the scope has 7 ns less delay than the current waveform traveling down the coaxial cable to the scope. This can be reduced to insignificance by averaging several waveforms. An example of this approach will be covered in next month's Technical Tidbit for December 2010.
I would like to thank RMV Technology Group at NASA Ames Research Center for use of their facilities to generate the data for this Technical Tidbit.
Additional articles on this website related to this topic are:
- September 2004, Mobile Phone Response to EMI from Small Metal ESD
(for an example of ESD radiated noise into a scope measurement)
- Teseq NSG 438 ESD Simulator (700K pdf file)
- Fischer Custom Communications F-65 Currrent Probe
- Agilent Infinium 54845a scope
I would like to thank RMV Technology Group for the use of their facilities to perform the tests for this article.
Need help with a design or additional training on technical subjects? Click on the image below to go to CircuitAdvisor.com, a new engineering resource for training, news, and fun.
Need help with a design or additional training on technical subjects? Click on the image below to go to CircuitAdvisor.com, a new engineering resource for training, news, and fun.
If you like the information in this article and others on this website,
much more information is available in my courses. Click here
to see a listing of upcoming courses on design, measurement, and
troubleshooting of chips, circuits, and systems. Click here to see upcoming seminars in Newport Beach, CA.
Click here for a description of my latest seminar titled (now also available online as a WebEx seminar):
EMC
Lab Techniques for Designers
(How to find EMC problems and have some confidence your system will pass EMC testing while it is still in your lab).
(How to find EMC problems and have some confidence your system will pass EMC testing while it is still in your lab).
Home