Discussion: Figure 1
shows a plot of the current measured at both ends of the injection
clamp defined in IEEE Std 802.3™-2002 Annex 40B which is shown in
Figure 2. The clamp and its connection to a test board are
shown. Although the
Fischer F-65 current probe is shown positioned next
to the test board, in fact it was placed as close as possible to the right end
of the clamp to generate the data in Figure 1.
Looking
at the top trace of Figure 1, one can see three well defined resonances
due to the injection clamp at about 310 MHz, 620 MHz, and 930 MHz. The resonances were in the clamp, not in the test setup. Note
that up to 250 MHz, the upper frequency used for 1000Base-T
Ethernet testing, the injected current supplied to the test board is well
behaved. The downward slope is likely due to the inductance of the 20
cm cable between the clamp and the test board. For 10GBase-T Ethernet
testing, the clamp is being used up to 1000 MHz. Taking into consideration the data shown in
Figure 1, this is probably not a good idea.
Figure 2. Current Probe Placement on the Test Board Side of Clamp
Figure 3 shows ferrite cores on the 10GBase-T Ethernet cable on the opposite
side of the clamp. IEEE Std 802.3™-2002 Annex 40B calls for just two ferrite cores
here. I do not believe one can achieve enough isolation between the
uncontrolled common mode world over a bandwidth all the way to one GHz with just two cores. Lab experience bears this out as
touching the cable to the left of only two cores, in one test,
significantly changed the current plot of Figure 1.
Figure
3 shows a
solution, 11 ferrite cores comprised out of a mixture of low and high
frequency cores arranged in a non-repeating pattern. When the current
probe was positioned shown in Figure 3, the bottom trace of Figure 1
results. The lower trace is near the noise floor of the analyzer at
many frequencies. The ratio between the two traces is 20+ dB, enough
to insure adequate isolation of the uncontrolled common mode
environment past the ferrites, so that common mode variations do not
significantly affect the current delivered to the test board or EUT.
The 11 ferrites used here seem to be the minimum needed
unless much better ferrite cores can be found. For the case of just two
high frequency ferrites, the two plots of Figure 1 do not show much
separation, especially below 500 MHz.
Figure 3. Current Probe Placement on Opposite Side of Clamp From TEst Board
An additional problem
may exist as well at the high end of the frequency range used for conducted
immunity testing of 10GBase-T Ethernet ports. The problem is caused by the clamp which ends abruptly and
may capacitively couple more to one wire of a twisted pair than the other wire of the same pair. This
seemed to be happening during this test. When the clamp was moved about
1/2 cm, comparable a twist length of the pairs in the cable (the twist lengths are
all slightly different to minimize crosstalk), a difference was seen on some pairs in the
resulting differential mode interference. This effect needs to be more
thoroughly investigated.